Rethinking the Role of Mother (or parent…)

Okay, so I’ve been listening to some great CD’s of lectures by Naomi Aldort. There’s so much to chew on that I won’t be able to write about my thoughts for awhile, but at least you know what I’ve been up to.

Also, I read this and the chapters that follow, and I’m all like AMEND AND AMEND. (Madea style ;) )

The people of today have different ideas about babies, children, and mothers than the people of long ago. Today they believe that the main thing mothers should do is to train their children, starting when they are babies, to grow up right-even if that means hurting them sometimes. They also think that if mothers were always with their babies, sleeping with them and holding them all the time and never punishing or disciplining them, that, as they grew older, they would be spoiled and not be able to get along with people and not even know how to be alone. They would be used to always having their own way so they would not obey their teachers in school or other adults. They would also be used to always getting what they wanted so they would use up all their parents money by always buying toys and candy and anything that they saw and wanted. But more likely they would not even grow up because, for sure, they would run in front of a car and get killed because their mothers let them do whatever they want.

If they did live to grow up, they would turn out to be selfish, and they would never work or do anything worthwhile because they would expect everyone, including the government, to support and take care of them. They would even make us lose wars because, being spoiled, they would not be willing to fight for our freedom.

Some people think that if children were cared for by their mothers the way they were a long, long time ago, they would not want to grow up. They would remain attached to their mothers forever. Maybe they believe this because to them having such a mother would be so nice that they think no one in their right mind would ever be willing to give up such a good thing. What these people don’t seem to know is that having a mother like that, the way nature intended, is the only way you really can grow up. You see, if you have had a real mother, you don’t need one as you get older. You can go on to the next step of becoming a responsible, grown-up person like your mother, someone, who because they were cared for, finds it natural to be caring of others.

I think that people who believe that having a mother who is always there for you is a bad thing, never had such a mother. And I also believe that they don’t want anyone else to have such a mother because they didn’t. I also know that when people left the world of nature they lost something. A lot of people would agree with me on that one, but they would say that what we lost was paradise. But they’re wrong. What we lost was mother and our belief in natural human growth through mothering.

Woah.

4 comments

1 Crystal { 08.26.09 at 5:21 pm }

You and I share eerily simular ideas on parenting.

2 Summer { 08.26.09 at 8:15 pm }

Such a radical, yet obvious concept. If we allow our children to be children, and us to be parents, they will not need to be so when they are older. I always thought of it as teaching them to walk a tightrope. Sure I could push them out on it now and expect them to learn to walk it, but I know that they will succeed if I carry them across it first until they are ready.

3 Vivian { 08.26.09 at 10:51 pm }

Yes! And for me just this concept of simply valueing them as fully human beings, with choices and desires and responsiveness and needs, just with less experience and knowledge to equip them with all the things we are told to “drill” or “beat” into them until we get little cooperative drones that every one praises as such a “good” boy and girl. Only its blind obedience, right? Usually for the desire for love (conditional love we’re teaching them by withholding and punishing and praise) along with a good helping of guilt and fear.
I know you don’t share my beliefs in Jesus, but when I read about Him I believe that had he been a parent, he would have been a wise one, and would never have thought to coerce or force his children into obedience. Hey, wait a minute- maybe I know that because I consider US God’s children and that’s precisely how he “parents” – natural consequences are not “punishments” but lessons and mistakes are never big enough to remove His love of us. Maybe that is why I feel so “against the grain” of traditional church parenting advice because it seems so completely counter to the God I know and love as a Father.
Wow, that was a rant and not aimed at you! lol I love your blog, btw, I keep prancing back over there to get more good stuff. I even have your son’s YouTube video reading the Bob Book’s at 4 bookmarked to show Ethan. I think he would find it wildly fun to see another boy his age reading the same book (you know how they think THEIR’S is the ONLY one at that age, lol.)
Anyway, whew, I better go to bed, this was a novel and I need to crash before this crosses into a Vivian ramble-athon. A very fine line.

4 Rachel { 09.03.09 at 6:05 am }

Love it! Thanks for all the info. I agree with your comment on God the loving Father. We have to learn from our own mistakes sometimes.

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled